| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
| System | Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B |
| Memory | 6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110902 |
| Uptime | 4.7 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 19 '17 at 05:15 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | MYS-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
| CPU Throttled | 50% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
42.8%
Average
|
34% 48.2 Pts
|
14% 113 Pts
|
8% 135 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B6) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2462
|
1.08%
Terrible
|
1% 1.72 fps
|
1% 1.49 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JEDO Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
26.6%
Poor
|
36% 47.1 MB/s
|
51% 0.49 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5428-040.A01LF Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
41.7%
Average
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
16% 5.47 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B Builds (Compare 292 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 64x |
| Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 58x |
| Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples | 47x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 162x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 69x |
| GeForce GT 520MXNvidiaBench 2%, 1,577 samples | 40x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $228 |