Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '17 at 14:16
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 141
60% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 436
43% 350 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E289) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Lighting 70.5
Reflection 60
Parallax 83.6
57% 71.3 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 76.1
54% 65 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 390
Write 217
Mixed 272
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 20.3
90% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 47.3
67% 125 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
925GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 153
Mixed 145
118% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.29
4K Write 2.77
4K Mixed 0.36
145% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 109%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13
59GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.03% Terrible
Read 30.4
Write 8.39
Mixed 24.3
24% 21 MB/s
4K Read 1.83
4K Write 0.44
4K Mixed 0.35
34% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.03%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.8% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 15.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.4
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback