Asus P8Z68-V GEN3

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z68-V GEN3 (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '17 at 11:41
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2380P 653 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Memory 95.1 1-Core 88 2-Core 175 72% 119 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 342 46% 341 Pts	64-Core 345 21% 345 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.8% Average	Lighting 56.2 Reflection 60.8 Parallax 51.8 46% 56.3 fps	MRender 51.3 Gravity 53.5 Splatting 60.6 46% 55.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.3.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 94 36561307 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 -15118284853331 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4566 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 121 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 37 57 64428245029 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 36561307 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 36561307 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 36561307 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 21091 (EA) Unknown 0 0 16674 (F1) Unknown 0 0 16674 (F2) Unknown 0 0 34404	35.2% Below average	Read 402 Write 101 Mixed 147 47% 217 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 5.86 40% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 18.2 DQ Write 49.4 DQ Mixed 26.3 22% 31.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 83%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 9GB free Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 15238 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2500 (B1) Unknown 93 93 74 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 56 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 147 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13129248723	28% Poor	Read 270 Write 34.8 Mixed 52.9 25% 119 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 27 4K Mixed 6.94 44% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 54.1 DQ Write 43.4 DQ Mixed 18.1 22% 38.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 87GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 181 177 3950 (04) Start/Stop count 85 85 15463 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 17587 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3766 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 140 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 15322 (C2) HDA temperature 106 100 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.1% Average	Read 73 Write 73.2 Mixed 71.8 55% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.41 110% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 85GB free Firmware: 50.0AB50 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 199 1320 (03) Spinup time 182 164 5883 (04) Start/Stop count 85 85 15225 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 1 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 28502 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5364 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 731 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 302827 (C2) HDA temperature 110 103 40 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	30.6% Below average	Read 56.2 Write 50.4 Mixed 35.7 35% 47.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.29 4K Mixed 0.1 36% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	63.3% Good	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 20.8 64% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 17.1 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 56.8 70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z68-V GEN3 Builds (Compare 853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V GEN3

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	250x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	198x
Core i7-2700KIntel $89Bench 73%, 20,692 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	73x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	63x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	60x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	28x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	41x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	29x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $526

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16