User System

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Default Default string
Motherboard	INTEL SKYBAY
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20170421
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '17 at 08:53
Run Duration	311 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	73%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6200U 135,462 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 78.6 2-Core 138 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 238 29% 221 Pts	64-Core 238 15% 238 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Intel(8086 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4534 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.91% Terrible	Lighting 6.53 Reflection 9.31 Parallax 6 5% 7.28 fps	MRender 5.19 Gravity 5.47 Splatting 13.2 7% 7.94 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.91% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 120GB-$100 901 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 9609574 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -92986041958397 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 13 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 11 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 56 68 103083671608 (C2) HDA temperature 56 68 103083671608 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 9609574 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 9609574 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 9609574 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 68719476736 (E9) Unknown 0 0 23 (EA) Unknown 0 0 36 (F1) Unknown 0 0 36 (F2) Unknown 0 0 30 (F4) Unknown 100 100 131072	68.1% Good	Read 499 Write 157 Mixed 237 65% 298 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 79.8 4K Mixed 18.7 112% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 100 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 39.6 55% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 81%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 8GB 4,577 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 4GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 37.6 Write 4.68 Mixed 9.37 16% 17.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.28 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.89 97% 2.22 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905624-023.A00G 1x8GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	41.1% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 11.8 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 12.8 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)