Toshiba Satellite A660

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite A660  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA NWQAA
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '17 at 22:21
Run Duration850 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3 M 380-$200
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
33.6% Below average
SC Int 59.2
SC Float 61.3
SC Mixed 60
48% 60.2 Pts
QC Int 144
QC Float 160
QC Mixed 154
34% 152 Pts
MC Int 142
MC Float 148
MC Mixed 144
22% 144 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FD31) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2119
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 13
Parallax 2.6
1% 6.07 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.6
1% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK6465GSXN 640GB
386GB free
Firmware: GH10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 46.3
Write 48
Mixed 45.2
35% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.03
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.04
6% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27%
Great: 47%
Adata S102 Pro USB 3.0 16GB-$9
3GB free, PID 312b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
8.1% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 15.7
Mixed 11.4
19% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.02
4K Write 0.44
4K Mixed 0.33
34% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.1%
Great: 25%
Adata S102 Pro USB 3.0 16GB-$9
2GB free, PID 312b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.12% Terrible
Read 23
Write 5.9
Mixed 6.81
12% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.19
25% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.12%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-G7 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
23.2% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.3
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 32%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Satellite A660 Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Toshiba Satellite A660

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $245
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $96
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $126
Intel Core i5-7600K $220Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $158SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $842SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $180SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback