Asus A6Km

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus A6Km  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK A6Km
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '17 at 20:42
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion 64 Mobile Technology MT-30
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.2% Below average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 10.8
2-Core 20.8
27% 32.3 Pts
4-Core 21.4
8-Core 19.4
3% 20.4 Pts
64-Core 21.2
1% 21.2 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 7300
Asus(1043 1101) 64MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 7.15.11.7948
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.16% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.27
Parallax 0.09
0% 0.22 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.16%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541080G9AT00 80GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MB4VA60A Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
9.71% Terrible
Read 17
Write 17
Mixed 4.01
9% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.03
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
4% 0.02 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x0.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
7.4% Terrible
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 1.9
6% 1.97 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 0
2% 0.67 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.4%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback