| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A |
| Memory | 1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110905 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 04 '17 at 21:46 |
| Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.9%
Above average
|
62% 101 Pts
|
25% 188 Pts
|
12% 190 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C606) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2266
|
1.94%
Terrible
|
2% 2.34 fps
|
2% 2.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
49.2%
Average
|
63% 84 MB/s
|
75% 0.81 MB/s
| |
|
WD Elements 500GB
99GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
12.2%
Very poor
|
27% 22.1 MB/s
|
53% 0.65 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
29.4%
Poor
|
27% 9.33 GB/s
|
26% 9.07 GB/s
|
54% 74.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A Builds (Compare 171 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples | 52x |
| Core i3-2330MIntel $150Bench 47%, 20,066 samples | 49x |
| Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 32x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 103x |
| GeForce GT 520MXNvidiaBench 2%, 1,577 samples | 29x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 27x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $81 |