PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H (all builds) |
Memory | 1.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20131023 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 13 '17 at 13:06 |
Run Duration | 187 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 79% |
CPU Throttled | 69% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron G1610T
Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G1610T @ 2.30GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
|
41%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
|
0.43%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HTS725032A9A364 320GB-$55
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PC3OC72E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 8502 PSD32G13332 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
|
37.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 865x |
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 594x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 355x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 374x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 252x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 181x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $405 |