Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130117
Uptime6 Days
Run DateMar 04 '17 at 01:40
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 197
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 390
52% 390 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Nvidia(10DE 097A) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 35.3
Parallax 45
32% 39.9 fps
MRender 48.3
Gravity 45.4
Splatting 36.4
35% 43.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 304
Write 35.9
Mixed 67.6
29% 136 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 11
66% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 54
DQ Mixed 7.95
38% 91.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 85%
Lexar WorkflowCFR1 128GB
61GB free, PID ba02
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 28.9
Mixed 34.4
43% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.19
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.96
100% 3.11 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 57%
Kingston DT microDuo 3.0 64GB
59GB free, PID 16a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 120
Write 42.2
Mixed 50.2
76% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.99
113% 3.28 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 33%
Great: 26%
Monster MONSTER DIGITAL 32GB
16GB free, PID 5450
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 153
Write 11.1
Mixed 29.8
56% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.84
4K Write 0.77
4K Mixed 0.92
87% 3.18 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 28%
Monster MONSTER DIGITAL 32GB
16GB free, PID 5450
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 151
Write 13.8
Mixed 26.1
55% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.89
4K Write 0.28
4K Mixed 0.69
62% 2.95 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,002 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback