Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H170 PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '17 at 15:04
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 74.7 1-Core 115 2-Core 223 76% 137 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 418 57% 423 Pts	64-Core 426 26% 426 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Zotac(19DA 2370) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1557 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.19 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.4% Above average	Lighting 61.7 Reflection 73.3 Parallax 65.1 50% 66.7 fps	MRender 76.2 Gravity 64.4 Splatting 59 54% 66.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 419GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3364 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1316 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 48 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 79 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10440763688	106% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 402 Mixed 419 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 63.6 4K Mixed 45.4 153% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 120 138% 239 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 134%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 5791761 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -126409477455289 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 201 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 16 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 23 33 68721639447 (C2) HDA temperature 23 33 68721639447 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5791761 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5791761 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5791761 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 34359738368 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1390 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1127 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1127 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1120 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1638409	61.4% Good	Read 381 Write 127 Mixed 154 48% 221 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 99 4K Mixed 17.7 114% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 97.7 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 38.2 51% 91.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 73%
WD Re 1TB (2013)-$65 3,754 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 670GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 174 4258 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 469 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 593 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 212 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 20 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 448 (C2) HDA temperature 121 108 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	72.3% Very good	Read 136 Write 115 Mixed 118 93% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.47 140% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB 49,673 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	69.6% Good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 22.5 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 21.7 SC Mixed 16.5 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 91 44% 91 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	449x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	362x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	327x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	230x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	210x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	185x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	135x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	70x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	122x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	90x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $667

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16