Asus Rampage Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Rampage Formula (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100311
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '16 at 20:25
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Memory 67.9 1-Core 42.2 2-Core 80.9 41% 63.7 Pts	4-Core 86.2 8-Core 83.9 11% 85.1 Pts	64-Core 84.4 5% 84.4 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% PwrHis(1787 3000) 3GB CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.11.4 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.5% Below average	Lighting 47.6 Reflection 31.7 Parallax 63.1 39% 47.5 fps	MRender 30.2 Gravity 46.4 Splatting 39.6 32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBBU240G1122 240GB 2,683 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3106000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 53 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 58 (A5) Unknown 100 100 12892831796 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 30 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 55 193273528359 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 73014902801 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 117 (EA) Unknown 100 100 469 (F1) Unknown 253 253 261 (F2) Unknown 253 253 242 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	34.3% Below average	Read 230 Write 112 Mixed 38.3 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 4.11 59% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 19.9 DQ Write 64.3 DQ Mixed 5.62 15% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 66%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 139 139 34386674080 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 56 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 65 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 40 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 56 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 56 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 141734576160 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	93.1% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 162 Mixed 74.3 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 0.22 109% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 107%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13 1,615 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 48GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.26% Terrible	Read 33 Write 2.92 Mixed 22.6 21% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.57 4K Write 0.65 4K Mixed 0.53 53% 1.58 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.26% Great: 38%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 800 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 82GB free, PID ce23 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 31.1 Mixed 10.9 30% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.3 59% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	20.2% Poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Rampage Formula Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	36x
Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples	34x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	7x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	5x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	94x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	20x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $248

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16