Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics 1,618 User benchmarks, average bench 22% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Memory 42.9 1-Core 20.5 2-Core 39.9 24% 34.4 Pts	4-Core 41.5 8-Core 40.3 6% 40.9 Pts	64-Core 37.8 2% 37.8 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 7,644 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2B23) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.28% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 1.69 1% 2.03 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 2.48 2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.28% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ASMT 2115 256GB 289 User benchmarks, average bench 134% 213GB free (System drive), PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 30.8 Write 27.4 Mixed 29.1 37% 29.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.77 4K Write 5.72 4K Mixed 2.88 314% 4.79 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 225%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB 38,580 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 4.6 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4.8 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 189 21% 189 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16