Asrock 970 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '16 at 03:04
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Memory 53.2
1-Core 15.7
2-Core 31.5
25% 33.5 Pts
4-Core 59.9
8-Core 433
24% 246 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
AMD(1002 00D0) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 19.6
18% 19.3 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 20
14% 16.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 376
Mixed 395
93% 420 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 33.7
145% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 39.2
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 21.4
36% 67.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 160GB-$82
144GB free
Firmware: SB4OC70P Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 37.7
Write 35.1
Mixed 36.1
27% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.26
68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 21%
Great: 25%
Hitachi HTS542516K9SA00 160GB-$298
1GB free
Firmware: BBCOC31P Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 28.8
Mixed 27.2
21% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.34
76% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 30%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
26GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 30
Write 15.8
Mixed 20.5
26% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.36
132% 2.42 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-004.A00DT Corsair CMY32GX3M4A2400C11 99P5471-004.A00DT Corsair CMY32GX3M4A2400C11 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.4% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 9.7
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 - $82

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $370
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback