Asrock Z77 Extreme6

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme6 (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121128
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '16 at 11:47
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 101 2-Core 202 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 382 52% 384 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Asus(1043 83F6) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7290 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Lighting 42.6 Reflection 37.9 Parallax 53.7 35% 44.7 fps	MRender 50.9 Gravity 48.4 Splatting 36.7 36% 45.3 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB-$503 3,421 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: M306 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 144 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 98 98 271 (09) Power-on hours count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1819 (AB) Unknown 100 100 1 (AC) Unknown 100 100 286 (B5) Unknown 100 100 1 (B6) Unknown 100 100 286 (C2) HDA temperature 36 0 81607524388 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 253 253 1 (EA) Unknown 100 100 85970 (F1) Unknown 100 100 10032 (F2) Unknown 100 100 20578 (FA) Read error retry rate 253 253 0	57.7% Above average	Read 374 Write 320 Mixed 243 69% 312 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 4.97 55% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 73.7 84% 142 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 393GB free Firmware: CC4G Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 199774352 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4975 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 88976579 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 14034 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1818 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 9 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 47 622133284 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 54 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 64 64 73052 (C2) HDA temperature 36 53 77309411364 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -139217069924819 (F1) Unknown 100 253 -3795618132274 (F2) Unknown 100 253 136177987414267	92.6% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 158 Mixed 111 108% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 0.32 98% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 114%
Seagate Wireless 1TB 411 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 218GB free, PID a313 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 67.2 Write 56.2 Mixed 45.2 69% 56.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.28 69% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 43%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 126GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Read 39.3 Write 41.9 Mixed 39.6 52% 40.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.29 80% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 23%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 2,523 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 5GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 126 Write 73.7 Mixed 50.8 94% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.62 4K Write 0.86 4K Mixed 0.69 77% 2.72 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.3% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.2 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 17.3 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme6 - $236

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	294x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	210x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	110x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	76x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	47x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	45x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	29x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	25x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 21,220 samples	23x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	20x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 54%, 12,350 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $720

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16