Toshiba Qosmio X300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 7 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba Qosmio X300  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA KSRAA
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080704
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 02 '16 at 21:49
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
19.9% Very poor
SC Int 59.8
SC Float 34.4
SC Mixed 42.7
37% 45.6 Pts
QC Int 111
QC Float 62.2
QC Mixed 78.6
19% 83.8 Pts
MC Int 113
MC Float 66.7
MC Mixed 82.3
13% 87.4 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 21%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9700M GTS
Toshiba(1179 FF01) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8642
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
2.99% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 16
Parallax 3.8
2% 10.2 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 10.2
6% 9.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.99%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS722016K9SA00 160GB-$51
124GB free
Firmware: DCDO Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 42.9
Write 39.1
Mixed 12.1
23% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 0.58
4K Mixed 0.18
42% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 31%
Hitachi HTS722016K9SA00 160GB-$51
100GB free
Firmware: DCDO Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 51.5
Write 54.1
Mixed 10.8
28% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.34
78% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 31%
Lexar JumpDrive S73 USB 3.0 64GB-$25
2GB free, PID a205
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Read 24.8
Write 19.1
Mixed 10.3
21% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.27
4K Mixed 0.01
17% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.4
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19%
Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Qosmio X300 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $144
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $366Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i5-7600K $233AMD RX 480 $608Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $297Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $243Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $169
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $34
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $696SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $144SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback