Gigabyte GA-MA785GT-UD3H

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA785GT-UD3H (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091203
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '16 at 15:25
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 83.7 1-Core 50.3 2-Core 99.7 51% 77.9 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 197 26% 198 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670 18,196 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B E155) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	5.34% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 7.54 Parallax 6.03 6% 6.86 fps	MRender 5.76 Gravity 5.23 Splatting 5.87 5% 5.62 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.34% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 121 Write 88.7 Mixed 77.6 21% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 7.9 60% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 17.7 DQ Write 67.1 DQ Mixed 7.84 16% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 73%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 443GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 103 Write 89.2 Mixed 70.3 65% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.18 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 87%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 G2 USB 3.0 32GB-$30 1,204 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 21GB free, PID 16a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 24.2 Write 14.3 Mixed 19.1 23% 19.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.89 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.62 65% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 11.9 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8.9 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-MA785GT-UD3H Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA785GT-UD3H

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	28x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	18x
Athlon II X4 620AMDBench 44%, 5,981 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	11x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	6x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x
Trion 150 240GBOCZ $196Bench 79%, 15,660 samples	4x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x

RAM
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	14x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	14x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $120

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16