Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory61.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '16 at 05:33
Run Duration353 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 85.8
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 217
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 683
67% 546 Pts
64-Core 838
52% 838 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8537) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5906
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 44.5
Parallax 38.8
37% 42.9 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 35.8
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 485
Write 134
Mixed 180
58% 266 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 25.4
116% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 82.3
99% 176 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 126%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
966GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 99.8
Write 67.8
Mixed 68.5
59% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.29
76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 55%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
966GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 73.7
Mixed 92.6
67% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.16
67% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
542GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
533GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
WD My Passport 2TB
875GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 92.1
Write 77
Mixed 85.9
108% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.17
77% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 44%
Kingston DataTraveler HyperX USB 3.0 64GB-$104
60GB free, PID 162b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 182
Write 60.6
Mixed 50.2
99% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.05
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.28
49% 2.58 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 83%
Mushkin Ventura Pro USB 3.0 64GB-$72
43GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 172
Write 58.6
Mixed 39.7
90% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.72
4K Write 0.52
4K Mixed 0.58
59% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 40.6
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 21
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback