PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P5Q (all builds) |
Memory | 2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20081126 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Sep 21 '18 at 21:48 |
Run Duration | 172 Seconds |
Run User | GRC-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
48.1%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
31.7%
Below average
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 27 31 42 41 MB/s
|
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
65.5%
Good
|
||||
Seagate Desktop HDD 5TB (2015)-$634
9GB free
Firmware: CC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 123 124 132 136 133 MB/s
|
84.3%
Excellent
|
|||
64.7%
Good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
20.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 74x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 55x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 38x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 23x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 21x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |