| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 4.72% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7B24 |
| Motherboard | MSI B360M PRO-VDH (MS-7B24) (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180518 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 20 '18 at 13:51 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 40% |
PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.2%
Very good
|
79% 136 Pts
|
43% 339 Pts
|
24% 382 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
MSI(1462 2874) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.63
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
17% 21.4 fps
|
19% 23.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1225G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 38 40 39 41 40 MB/s
|
4.72%
Terrible
|
9% 41 MB/s
|
2% 0.53 MB/s
| |
|
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
194GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.3 3.4 3.2 4.4 4.4 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS4G4D26BFSB.8FE 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
75.2%
Very good
|
78% 27.1 GB/s
|
58% 20.3 GB/s
|
58% 68.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B360M PRO-VDH (MS-7B24) Builds (Compare 2,499 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI B360M PRO-VDH (MS-7B24)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 610x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 535x |
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 451x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 310x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 220x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 193x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 93% - Outstanding | Total price: $586 |