Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateSep 17 '18 at 17:49
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$197
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 181
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 470
48% 387 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 24
Parallax 31.6
21% 27.1 fps
MRender 32.7
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 25.3
24% 29.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 199 191 203 133 110 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.1% Good
Read 283
Write 172
Mixed 242
SusWrite 170
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 30.5
114% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 124
105% 152 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 133%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
839GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 120 119 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 142
Write 130
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 120
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 76%
Flash USB Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 3a04
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.5 3.1 3.7 4.2 3.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
4.67% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 1.2
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 3.6
7% 6.83 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.67%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 9905474-060.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $225
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback