Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 14 '18 at 23:24
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 202
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 296
39% 295 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.34% Terrible
Lighting 7.43
Reflection 8.69
Parallax 6.19
6% 7.44 fps
MRender 9.29
Gravity 7.73
Splatting 8.35
7% 8.46 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.34%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 120GB
4GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 878
Write 163
Mixed 186
88% 409 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 29.7
113% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 85.3
71% 102 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 94%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,757
Write 832
Mixed 1,176
276% 1,255 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 63.5
210% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 735
DQ Write 642
DQ Mixed 701
522% 693 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
33GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 134 131 136 137 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 128
Write 132
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 134
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
114GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 98 96 98 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 90
Write 81
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 97.2
62% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GLLG42F-18---------- 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $569
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback