HP G5307fr

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP G5307fr (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2A99
Memory	6.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110208
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 02 '16 at 11:07
Run Duration	283 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	98%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri) 19,471 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Memory 78.6 1-Core 43.4 2-Core 60.2 43% 60.7 Pts	4-Core 67.3 8-Core 72.1 9% 69.7 Pts	64-Core 80.7 5% 80.7 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8460) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.5286 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 2.96 Parallax 1.84 2% 2.4 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 2.43 2% 2.59 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB 21,984 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 86GB free Firmware: 3.2. Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.2% Poor	Read 238 Write 164 Mixed 133 39% 178 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 5.51 30% 9.95 MB/s	DQ Read 17.9 DQ Write 16.5 DQ Mixed 7.28 8% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 56%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 53GB free Firmware: 01.0 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 67.7 Write 71.8 Mixed 66.7 52% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.25 83% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 54%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB 6,973 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP35 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 69.9 Write 66.1 Mixed 63.4 50% 66.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.44 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 69%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 5,895 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 896GB free, PID a00c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 21.4 Write 21.7 Mixed 13 23% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.21 66% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 2,234 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 382GB free, PID a009 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 21.4 Write 21.6 Mixed 13.1 23% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.2 58% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.37 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 6.5 17% 6.03 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP G5307fr

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)