Lenovo 3212CC9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 3212CC9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180223
Uptime2 Days
Run DateAug 24 '18 at 01:43
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 193
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 371
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Lighting 49.2
Reflection 33
Parallax 39
40% 40.4 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 44.1
Splatting 38.3
33% 40 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 346 334 247 250 250 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 298
Write 347
Mixed 275
SusWrite 295
69% 304 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 26.6
89% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 99.8
DQ Mixed 37.3
36% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 186 186 187 188 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 159
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 185
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 24.1
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 29.4
19% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
178% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 87%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 9.8 9.7 9.9 9.8 9.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
4.98% Terrible
Read 13.9
Write 5.3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 9.6
10% 8.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.98%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.5% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3212CC9 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 3212CC9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $626
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback