Lenovo 20BX0011MD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20BX0011MD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BX0011MD
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '18 at 22:49
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 47.7
1-Core 19.8
2-Core 47.1
26% 38.2 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 214
22% 175 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5036) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.19
Parallax 3.84
3% 3.88 fps
MRender 8.14
Gravity 3.43
Splatting 11.6
7% 7.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.21%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT09L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 215 223 225 223 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 377
Write 229
Mixed 157
SusWrite 218
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 16.7
60% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 61.9
75% 132 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4B8G1646B-MYK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 15.7
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback