Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateAug 16 '18 at 19:01
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 257
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 454
53% 412 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.2% Below average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 45
Parallax 39.2
37% 43.2 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 34.3
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 250GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 267 268 263 264 267 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 436
Mixed 352
SusWrite 276
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 50.6
183% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 232
208% 316 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 107%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
242GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 111 114 114 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 101
Write 98.5
Mixed 66
SusWrite 113
70% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
155GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 94 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 121
Write 115
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 95.9
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
656GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 61 62 60 60 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 59.4
Write 56.7
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 60.1
43% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.2% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 5.6
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $656
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback