Asrock H77M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H77M (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130809
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '18 at 13:46
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 101 2-Core 197 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 508 50% 407 Pts	64-Core 466 29% 466 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84D6) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.47% Terrible	Lighting 6.8 Reflection 7.19 Parallax 8 6% 7.33 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 7.13 5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.47% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4620 Write 3,377 Mixed 3494 850% 3,830 MB/s	4K Read 321 4K Write 176 4K Mixed 199 835% 232 MB/s	DQ Read 762 DQ Write 473 DQ Mixed 587 446% 607 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 430GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 124 126 127 131 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 131 Write 126 Mixed 73 SusWrite 128 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 69%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90 11,249 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 277GB free Firmware: 04.04V02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 119 116 116 116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 120 Write 117 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 117 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.3 236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 69%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB 6,669 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.2 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.5 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	4.06% Terrible	Read 18.2 Write 5 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 6.3 10% 9.07 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.06% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-466.A00LF 2x8GB 311 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	48.1% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 11.3 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77M Builds (Compare 366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H77M - $186

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	54x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	43x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	42x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	31x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	24x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	16x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	15x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $571

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16