Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7A64
Motherboard	MSI H270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64) (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20171121
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '18 at 17:42
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	71%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Memory 93.2 1-Core 136 2-Core 261 92% 163 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 624 68% 541 Pts	64-Core 720 44% 720 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 858D) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.3% Poor	Lighting 32.3 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 28.5 26% 30.7 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 29.3 Splatting 30.6 26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 96GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 125 124 134 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 399 Write 376 Mixed 310 SusWrite 122 68% 302 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 77.7 4K Mixed 17.4 108% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 144 118% 171 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 115%
Innovation IT 120GB 294 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 112GB free Firmware: Q1013E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 292 368 375 375 319 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Read 385 Write 371 Mixed 324 SusWrite 328 79% 352 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 84.6 4K Mixed 23.5 120% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 45.7 85% 165 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 886GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 169 185 182 178 173 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Read 133 Write 145 Mixed 15 SusWrite 175 84% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	75% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 22.6 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 28.2 SC Mixed 22.8 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	9x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	16x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	12x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	11x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $466

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16