Asrock 970 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics40.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '18 at 19:16
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 133
57% 94 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 315
34% 270 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
40.2% Average
Lighting 52.5
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 65.7
43% 51 fps
MRender 33.1
Gravity 51.1
Splatting 43.3
35% 42.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 409 408 400 404 382 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 402
Mixed 358
SusWrite 393
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 48.2
159% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 258
193% 258 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 103%
Great: 131%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 178 175 177 181 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 170
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 177
99% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
127% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 185 185 173 174 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 91
Write 104
Mixed 52
SusWrite 177
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.7
461% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.9% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 13
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $311
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback