| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q-PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090223 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 10 '18 at 13:12 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
38.3%
Below average
|
32% 47.5 Pts
|
13% 98.9 Pts
|
6% 100 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 280-$185
PwrHis(1787 5000) 3GB
CLim: 960 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.5.1
|
33.1%
Below average
|
35% 43.5 fps
|
30% 35.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 830 64GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 49 50 51 53 55 MB/s
|
26%
Poor
|
18% 79.6 MB/s
|
53% 16.7 MB/s
|
13% 19.3 MB/s
|
|
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
930GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 124 125 125 125 MB/s
|
75%
Very good
|
86% 117 MB/s
|
202% 1.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
11% 3.83 GB/s
|
10% 3.6 GB/s
|
31% 128 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 363 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 79x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 32x |
| Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 26x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 13x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |