Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 73.7 1-Core 66.6 2-Core 131 54% 90.4 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 473 42% 358 Pts	64-Core 491 30% 491 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000 13,958 User benchmarks, average bench 41% HP(103C 11B3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 391.33 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	43% Average	Lighting 53.1 Reflection 56 Parallax 47.3 43% 52.1 fps	MRender 46.2 Gravity 49.3 Splatting 57.3 42% 50.9 fps
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 42%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple SM0256L 251GB 176 User benchmarks, average bench 184% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXS5EA0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,166 Write 1,380 Mixed 826 251% 1,124 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 35.4 148% 59.2 MB/s	DQ Read 922 DQ Write 432 DQ Mixed 689 508% 681 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 224%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x4B3445424533303445422D45474347202020 2x8GB 707 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	65.3% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 20.9 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 14 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 93.1 43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

RAM
0x4D5435324C31473332443450472D30393320 2x8GBUnknownBench 72%, 2,090 samples	106x
0x4B3445424533303445422D45474347202020 2x8GBUnknownBench 71%, 707 samples	58x
0x483943434E4E4E434C47414C41522D4E5644 2x8GBUnknownBench 74%, 170 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16