Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	7.81GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.81GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	5.6 GB free of 7.8125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '18 at 20:21
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$195 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 77.1 1-Core 79.1 2-Core 154 61% 104 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 378 41% 324 Pts	64-Core 347 22% 347 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3703) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.0 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.3% Very good	Lighting 94.8 Reflection 109 Parallax 85.2 77% 96.4 fps	MRender 90.4 Gravity 92.7 Splatting 98.7 78% 94 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 88%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 43GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 39 45 50 49 80 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x7GB 828 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1 of 1 slots used 7GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.6 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 12.1 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 86.1 46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 121%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16