PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8Z77-V LK (all builds) |
Memory | 8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140321 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Aug 06 '18 at 15:21 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | SVK-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
70.7%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Gigabyte(1458 254D) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.7.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 356 295 301 294 291 MB/s
|
98.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
916GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 92 93 93 92 MB/s
|
50%
Average
|
|||
WD Elements 1.5TB
253GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 683x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 561x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 350x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 140x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 124x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 114x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $472 |