Biostar P4M900-M7 FE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar P4M900-M7 FE  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20071107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '18 at 18:22
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2180-$130
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Memory 35.9
1-Core 11.5
2-Core 22.9
17% 23.4 Pts
4-Core 23.1
8-Core 23
3% 23 Pts
64-Core 23
1% 23 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 41%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 61 63 27 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 56.6
Write 66.1
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 46.7
39% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.51% Terrible
MC Read 2.4
MC Write 1.6
MC Mixed 1.8
6% 1.93 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 1.3
5% 1.7 GB/s
Latency 222
18% 222 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.51%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P4M900-M7 FE Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar P4M900-M7 FE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback